🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.