Skip to content
Explore Scotland's rich heritage, stunning landscapes, and …

Might Different States Emulate Australia's in Restricting Social Media for Under-16s?

The Australian bold move to prohibit social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and parents are observing closely to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a increasing group of nations are considering comparable measures.

  • Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and apps are "stealing our kids' childhood". A law is expected to be passed soon.
  • The Norwegian government is preparing to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "influence of the algorithms".
  • The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an Australia-style ban is "one of the tools on the table".
  • In Spain, the prime minister has asked lawmakers to enact a proposal raising the access age for using social media to 16.
  • In France, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
  • The government in The Netherlands has recommended families to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has adopted a advisory statement calling for a ban for minors unless parental consent is given. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"A clear age restriction is a solid starting point," commented a leading parliamentarian behind the measure.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Eye

For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Previously, momentum built behind a legislative effort to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately modified. Instead, the administration vowed to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have raised apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the family of a teenager who died after being exposed to disturbing online content argues that a strict age ban may not make platforms safer and could lead to a "cliff edge" of exposure when teens become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to design tools that are safe and fit for children," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

Across America, legislation is primarily happening at the regional government level due to national inaction.

  • The state of Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
  • Florida has signed a bill banning children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
  • Virginia has approved a rule limiting minors to a single hour of social media use per day, with extra time dependent on adult consent.
  • Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly introduced bills demanding adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from certain individuals to mimic Australia's path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

International Views

Outside of these regions, additional nations are similarly considering moves.

  • Malaysia plans to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
  • Brazil has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, global bodies strike a more cautious position. Unicef has cautioned that social media bans have downsides and "could prove counterproductive". The agency points out that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

Even as this international debate unfolds, the actions of this nation and its followers demonstrate that policymakers around the world are less and less content to delay for the industry to self-regulate.

KH
The writer

Krista Harris

A Scottish travel writer and cultural enthusiast with over a decade of experience exploring and documenting Scotland's hidden gems.

Scotia Room

Type to search articles.